Dr. Robert Van Exan, former director of health and science policy at Canadian pharmaceutical giant Sanofi Pasteur, said tracking with barcodes in Canada “should have been written in the pandemic plan.”There was a plan to make these barcodes central to Canada’s public-health system, and there was a time when Canada was ahead in digitizing its health system “by a decade,” Dr. Van Exan said. Canada’s 1998 vaccine strategy first proposed barcoding vaccines to promote efficiency and accuracy. The 2003 SARS epidemic, and the creation of the Public Health Agency of Canada, hastened that work.In normal times, Canada administers millions of vaccines a year for diseases such as mumps and influenza. Provinces slowly adopted digitized immunization records in the early 2000s, but continued entering all the data manually: Audits of some provincial systems found fully 15 per cent of immunization records were incomplete, nearly a quarter had inaccurate information, and crucial data was missing from one in five adverse-reaction reports.In 2007, Ottawa tapped an advisory group made up of industry experts, including Dr. Van Exan, to plan the implementation of these barcodes. The total cost, the advisory group found, would have then been around $265-million, but they projected savings of $1-billion in the decades to come. They handed Ottawa a plan to start barcoding vaccines in warehouses, hospitals, clinics and pharmacies by 2014.This barcoding capability was an integral part of a broader digital infrastructure project known as the Vaccine Identification Database System (VIDS). Ottawa set up VIDS as a proof of concept for a single, national digitized public-health system to track infectious disease outbreaks and vaccination campaigns.Story continues below advertisementOttawa contracted IBM Canada to build a permanent vaccination version of VIDS, called Panorama. That’s where things “fell off the wagon,” Dr. Van Exan said. “IBM built a system that can’t read barcodes.”Beset by delays and cost increases, some provinces dropped the project. Even some provinces that stuck with Panorama have still not installed crucial components of the system. None of the provinces’ systems work with one another.“This is one of the big flaws in the whole damn system,” Dr. Van Exan said.
“Mr. McConnell had considered voting to convict the former president as a means of purging him from the party, but allies said he concluded he could not practically, as leader, side with a minority of his colleagues rather than the overwhelming number who said the trial was invalid and voted to acquit. Instead, he used every ounce of his rhetorical strength to try to damage Mr. Trump’s credibility with his own party. “
I think the trade-offs between privacy and health/safety are due for a re-balancing. I can’t help thinking that there’s a logical answer to the question, “Who are all these people?”. An analogy: investigators of fatal traffic accidents will often report whether the injured parties were wearing seatbelts or whether excessive speed was involved or whether alcohol was a factor. We should have Covid-19 investigators who report what contributing factors the patients have. A possible downside: some symptomatic people would delay getting tested if a positive result would “out” them….a trade-off worth making, I think.
Toronto’s affordable housing crisis has many facets. One of these many facets is the conversion – or rather, re-conversion – of big old houses in the older parts of the city that are full of relatively affordable rental apartments or rooms, back into single-family, owner-occupied homes. It’s a process that is no doubt affected by […]
Screwy and typical of Trump, but where’s the Republican National Convention in all this? I’m wondering if Trump overstepped his bounds by pulling the plug on the Jacksonville convention. It’s the RNC’s convention, not his. If he announced the cancellation without the blessing of the RNC he will have burned up a lot of good will with the GOP establishment.
A third of Americans now show signs of clinical anxiety or depression, Census Bureau finds amid coronavirus pandemic
The U.S. Census Bureau has been tracking adult American’s responses to the pandemic including some questions relating to mental health. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/covid19/pulse/mental-health.htm (with neat drop-down filters).
The results purport to measure some indicators of mental health wellness. I think the results are more an indicator of who’s paying attention The charts are based on respondent answers to these questions:
Over the last 7 days, how often have you been bothered by … having little interest or pleasure in doing things? Would you say not at all, several days, more than half the days, or nearly every day?
Over the last 7 days, how often have you been bothered by … feeling down, depressed, or hopeless? Would you say not at all, several days, more than half the days, or nearly every day?
Over the last 7 days, how often have you been bothered by the following problems … Feeling nervous, anxious, or on edge? Would you say not at all, several days, more than half the days, or nearly every day?
Over the last 7 days, how often have you been bothered by the following problems … Not being able to stop or control worrying? Would you say not at all, several days, more than half the days, or nearly every day?
“Feeling down”? “Feeling nervous”? I’d say that anyone who doesn’t acknowledge feeling down and feeling nervous hasn’t grasped the seriousness of the situation. I’m guessing that the two-thirds of Americans who are not showing signs of clinical anxiety or depression aren’t wearing face masks.
The breakdowns of the responses aren’t what I would have guessed. I thought people with more years of formal education would report more feelings of anxiety or depression. Wrong – it’s respondents with less formal education. And I thought younger respondents would report feeling more anxious/depressed than older people. Just the opposite.
With school boards across the continent struggling with planning for the most tumultuous school reorganization in anyone’s memory, it seems a bit far-fetched to protest possible reductions to French immersion
L’Assemblée de la francophonie de l’Ontario denounced talks about French programs in a tweet Wednesday night, calling it “totally unacceptable.”
“In a bilingual country, to propose the elimination of the teaching of one of the official languages is unthinkable,” the organization representing Franco-Ontarians wrote. “We also ask the Toronto District School Board to stop using official languages as a means of pressure to reach its goals. It’s damaging for the country.”
There’s something between the lines here…I agree with the author’s premise that fiscal policy to deal with the pandemic could lead to a Universal Basic Income but he muddies the waters when he turns philosophical and wonders about the future of capitalism. I’d like to know how creative programs to deal with the pandemic could reform conservative economic thinking. Don’t call it Universal Basic Income. Call it …? That’s what I want to know… how to present and package an effective safety net in a package that Republicans could support.