Individual actions to tackle climate change, even when added together, achieve so little because cheap and reliable energy underpins human prosperity. Fossil fuels currently meet 81% of our global energy needs. And even if every promised climate policy in the 2015 Paris climate agreement is achieved by 2040, they will still deliver 74% of the total.
When climate campaigners urge people to change their everyday behavior, they trivialize the challenge of global warming. The one individual action that citizens could take that would make a real difference would be to demand a vast increase in spending on green-energy research and development.
Source: Empty Gestures on Climate Change by Bjørn Lomborg – Project Syndicate
This report is from the same crowd that President Trump assembled shortly after his inauguration. Shortly after assembling that crowd he disbanded it. Phoenixes they were. The original members and additional experts reconvened to complete this present report (link to abstract, below). The group’s conclusions makes sense to me: spend some time and money to figure out how to cope with climate change (instead of wishin’ and hopin’ that we could find a collective will to reverse the changes.
Among the recommendations in the report is for governments to accelerate the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning to better analyze climate risks. With cities facing threats as varied as disrupted water supplies, rising tides and infrastructure damage from heat, AI could “reveal impacts, insights, and options that would be difficult to otherwise discover,” the report finds. The report also recommends better use of citizen science to “fill many long-standing data gaps” that could be especially useful to local governments. [from https://www.smartcitiesdive.com/news/climate-panel-disbanded-under-trump-reforms-with-local-focus/552079/ ]
Specific recommendations include: evaluating climate models and data using user-defined metrics; improving benefit-cost assessment and supporting decision-making under uncertainty, and accelerating application of tools and methods such as citizen science, artificial intelligence, indicators, and geospatial analysis.
Source: Evaluating Knowledge to Support Climate Action: A Framework for Sustained Assessment: Weather, Climate, and Society: Early Online Release
This report is a collaborative effort by Canada’s Federal and Provincial Attorneys-General. It concludes “that actions taken by governments to date to address climate change across the country have fallen short of the governments’ commitments.” Surprise, surprise.
The report includes national overviews and province-by-province analyses.
Perspectives on Climate Change Action in Canada—A Collaborative Report from Auditors General
This Ottawa blogger makes a lot of sense: measure the prospective value of cross-river infrastructure spending by the number of people moved, not the number of vehicles.
Source: No new bridges til we use the old ones first – West Side Action
No hard news or proposals here – just “pondering”. But it’s the first pondering from the Ontario PCs that does not strike me as ridiculous.
This is the PC government’s discussion paper on Reducing Litter and Waste in Our Communities: Discussion Paper I couldn’t find any proposed bans on single-use plastics in it. Regarding plastics in general the government is proposing more standardization for recycling, greater front-end involvement by manufacturers/packagers, and more Federal government leadership (which is unusual, coming from this particular bunch of PCs.)
Ontario government ponders ban on single-use plastics
Source: Ontario government ponders ban on single-use plastics | CBC News
No, not if this dairy farmer’s experience is representative.