Quadratic Equations

Now they tell us – a new and simpler way to solve quadratic equations.

Photo by Lewis Mulatero/Getty Images

A mathematician has derived an easier way to solve quadratic equation problems, according to MIT’s Technology Review.

Quadratic equations are polynomials that include an x², and teachers use them to teach students to find two solutions at once. The new process, developed by Dr. Po-Shen Loh at Carnegie Mellon University, goes around traditional methods like completing the square and turns finding roots into a simpler thing involving fewer steps that are also more intuitive.

Here’s Dr. Loh’s explainer video:

Quadratic equations fall into an interesting donut hole in education. Students learn them beginning in algebra or pre-algebra classes, but they’re spoonfed examples that work out very easily and with whole integer solutions. The same thing happens with the Pythagorean theorem, where in school, most examples end up solving out to Pythagorean triples , the small set of integer values that work cleanly into the Pythagorean theorem.

Quadratic equations are polynomials, meaning strings of math terms. An expression like “x + 4” is a polynomial. They can have one or many variables in any combination, and the magnitude of them is decided by what power the variables are taken to. So x + 4 is an expression describing a straight line, but (x + 4)² is a curve.

Since a line crosses just once through any particular latitude or longitude, its solution is just one value. If you have x², that means two root values, in a shape like a circle or arc that makes two crossings.

Dr. Loh’s method, which he also shared in detail on his website, uses the idea of the two roots of every quadratic equation to make a simpler way to derive those roots. He realized he could describe the two roots of a quadratic equation this way: Combined, they average out to a certain value, then there’s a value z that shows any additional unknown value. Instead of searching for two separate, different values, we’re searching fo

r two identical values to begin with. This simplifies the arithmetic part of multiplying the formula out.

Photo by Popular Mechanics

“Normally, when we do a factoring problem, we are trying to find two numbers that multiply to 12 and add to 8,” Dr. Loh said. Those two numbers are the solution to the quadratic, but it takes students a lot of time to solve for them, as they’re often using a guess-and-check approach.

Instead of starting by factoring the product, 12, Loh starts with the sum, 8.

If the two numbers we’re looking for, added together, equal 8, then they must be equidistant from their average. So the numbers can be represented as 4–u and 4+u.

When you multiply, the middle terms cancel out and you come up with the equation 16–u2 = 12. When solving for u, you’ll see that positive and negative 2 each work, and when you substitute those integers back into the equations 4–u and 4+u, you get two solutions, 2 and 6, which solve the original polynomial equation.

It’s quicker than the classic foiling method used in the quadratic formula—and there’s no guessing required. —Courtney Linder

Dr. Loh believes students can learn this method more intuitively, partly because there’s not a special, separate formula required. If students can remember some simple generalizations about roots, they can decide where to go next.

It’s still complicated, but it’s less complicated, especially if Dr. Loh is right that this will smooth students’s understanding of how quadratic equations work and how they fit into math. Understanding them is key to the beginning ideas of precalculus, for example.

Outside of classroom-ready examples, the quadratic method isn’t simple. Real examples and applications are messy, with ugly roots made of decimals or irrational numbers. As a student, it’s hard to know you’ve found the right answer. Dr. Loh’s new method is for real life, but he hopes it will also help students feel they understand the quadratic formula better at the same time.

Many math students struggle to move across the gulf in understanding between simple classroom examples and applying ideas themselves, and Dr. Loh wants to build them a better bridge.

Time Machine: Expos Uniforms in Nationals Park

As usual, I’m conflicted.  It’s great to see the old Expos uniforms, but it does seem a little goofy if you’re a Nationals fan.  Better: the suggestion of  sporting early 70s Washington Senators uniforms.

Washington Times columnist Thom Loverro called it a “cheap, lazy, thoughtless promotion,” indicating that any claim to a connection between the two teams seems as distasteful as American poutine.

To have Guerrero tossing the opening pitch is to “celebrate a corpse,” he suggested, and posited that D.C. should look to its own past, which includes the Washington Senators who took off for Texas in the early 1970s.

Commenters tended to agree, with one asking rhetorically: “why do we give a rats arse about Montreal?” Another local tweeted that the throwback jersey “manages to disrespect both Expos fans and fans of both Senators teams” (there were two iterations).

 

Source: Throwback Expos day at D.C. baseball game divides Montrealers — and Americans | CTV News

10 engines and 6 propellers

10 engines and 6 propeller sets, actually. Imagine working with the mad scientists who thought of that combination. Call me old-fashioned if you will, but Number of Propellers divided by Number of Engines should be a (positive) whole number.

from Saunders-Roe Princess – Wikipedia

The SR.45 Princess was a large flying boat, being the largest all-metal flying boat to have ever been constructed. The Princess featured a rounded, bulbous, “double-bubble” pressurized fuselage which contained two full passenger decks; these decks had sufficient room to accommodate up to 105 passengers in great comfort. The planing bottom of the hull had only a slight step in the keel to minimize drag in the air.[24] The Princess was powered by an arrangement of ten Bristol Proteus turboprop engines. These engines drove six sets of four-bladed propellers; of these, the inner four propellers were double, contra-rotating propellers which were driven by a twin version of the Proteus, named the Bristol Coupled Proteus, each engine drove one of the propellers. The two outer propellers were single and each powered by a single engine.[8]

Source: Saunders-Roe Princess – Wikipedia

Worker dies after falling into cement truck, paramedics say –

Whew!

A worker has died after falling into a cement truck at a construction company in the city’s east end, paramedics say.

At around 3:45 p.m. emergency crews were called to Lafarge Paving and Construction at 1641 Bearbrook Road in Gloucester, said Ottawa Paramedic Service spokesperson J.P. Trottier.

“The worker was standing at the top of the [cement] truck and fell into the loading funnel,” Trottier said.

“The injuries were obviously fatal injuries and we declared him deceased immediately.”

Ontario’s Ministry of Labour has been called in to investigate. A spokesperson for Lafarge said the company was “cooperating with the local authorities” and that it was “inappropriate” to comment further.

The man’s name and age have not been released.

Source: Worker dies after falling into cement truck, paramedics say – Ottawa – CBC News